Our verdict

The among backpacking boots from Scarpa struck us as an exceptionally supportive boot that's capable of pulling off pretty challenging multi-day hikes. We discovered that it is fully equipped to ensure more daring strides on rocky, root-strewn, and even muddy terrain. Not only were ankle rolls out of the question but soaking wet feet too! As long as you give it a proper break-in before the trip, we promise that this Scarpa boot will deliver on every demand you have on a tough backpacking adventure.

Pros

  • oz / 663g
  • Extra secure ankle support
  • Reasonable weight given the shoe's design
  • Excellent underfoot protection
  • Not for narrow feet
  • Warm and watertight upper
  • Spacious toebox (wide-foot friendly)
  • High-quality materials and craftsmanship

Cons

  • Not for narrow feet
  • Break-in needed

Audience verdict

89
Great!

a boot with deep lugs 4.0 mm and solid grip to traverse wet or muddy trails

We believe that the Scarpa among backpacking boots is an excellent choice for outdoor enthusiasts who need:

  • a stable and supportive high-cut boot for multi-day thru-hikes
  • a boot with deep lugs (4.0 mm) and solid grip to traverse wet or muddy trails
  • a sealed waterproof boot that keeps the feet dry and warm

Scarpa among backpacking boots who should buy

Who should NOT buy

At £250, the among backpacking boots isn't quite as light on our wallet as it felt on our feet. We suggest checking out the Salomon Quest 4 GTX which is cheaper by £20 but is just as technical and supportive. It is also our long-standing top pick among backpacking boots

While the Scarpa among backpacking boots is a comfy boot for its kind, we found that it took a while before we fully unlocked its true potential. As an alternative that isn't so rigid and more comfortable for all-day wear, have a look at the Warm and watertight upper.

Scarpa among backpacking boots cut

Breathability

Having a Gore-Tex membrane normally doesn't bode well for breathability. A boot's ability to keep water from penetrating its interiors usually means that it's pretty airtight too.

As our smoke test shows, this is clearly the case with the among backpacking boots. Not even a wisp of smoke managed to escape the boot's upper throughout the 10-second test. 

The KEEN NXIS Speed'Track and XC.

The boot's well-insulated nature was further confirmed upon inspecting a backlit cross-section of the upper. We saw that it entirely blocked out the light below! Apparently, there are no potential areas for heat to escape the boot. 

The toastiness of the among backpacking boots can't be attributed solely to the Gore-Tex lining, however, as its upper is made of solid suede and leather overlays with no gaps in the materials for ventilation.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Breathability microscope

While this isn't ideal for hot summer hikes, it does mean that frost-bitten toes were the least of our concerns while testing this boot in more frigid conditions. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Breathability material close up
Test results
among backpacking boots 1
Average 1.6
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

For what it lacks in breathability, the among backpacking boots's suede toebox turns out to be extremely tough.

We tested this with our Dremel which was set against the unprotected part of the boot's toebox with 3.2N of force spinning at 5K RPM. 

After 12 seconds of grinding, the among backpacking boots was left with a barely noticeable scuff at the point of contact. This excellent performance led us to give the among backpacking boots a perfect toebox durability score of 5 out of 5!

Add to that the boot's tough toe rand and you need not worry about any bumps or scrapes ruining the integrity of the toebox, even when traversing rough-and-ready terrains. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Toebox durability damage
Test results
among backpacking boots 5
Average 4.4
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Next, we turn our attention to another potentially vulnerable portion of the boot - the heel collar lining.

But to our amazement, the among backpacking boots nailed our durability test even in such a delicate part of the upper!

Looking as if it was never touched with sandpaper, the boot's inner lining earned the highest durability score from us - 5 out of 5!

Scarpa among backpacking boots Heel padding durability damage
Test results
among backpacking boots 5
Average 4
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

The among backpacking boots features Scarpa's proprietary PRESA compound in the outsole, Even though it's not the industry-leading Vibram rubber, it showed pretty solid results in our durability tests.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Outsole hardness durometer

First of all, this rubber compound is hard. And that is usually synonymous with hard-wearing.

When we pressed our Shore C durometer against the boot's outsole, the tool recorded a high reading of 90.0 HC. It is even a touch harder than the average.

Test results
among backpacking boots 90.0 HC
Average 87.6 HC
But thats not all.
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
81.0 HC
Outsole hardness
92.1 HC

Outsole durability

In our next step, we felt hard on the rubber by setting our Dremel speed to 10K RPM and holding sandpaper against one of the lugs for 22 seconds.

Given Scarpa's stellar reputation for durability, we weren't even surprised with the result. Our tread gauge measured a shallow 0.9 mm indentation in the boot's outsole.

This confirmed our initial assumptions of the boot's potentially long shelf life.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Outsole durability damage
Test results
among backpacking boots 0.9 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 19 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

We also found the amount of rubber at the bottom of the Scarpa among backpacking boots to be sufficient for a backpacking boot.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Outsole thickness caliper

With a calliper measurement of 2.3 mm (excluding the 4.0 mm lugs), this Scarpa boot promises a good while before it starts to lose integrity.

Test results
among backpacking boots 2.3 mm
Average 3.1 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1.8 mm
Outsole thickness
5.6 mm

Weight

Even though the Scarpa among backpacking boots clocked in more ounces than the average hiking boot, we deem its weight as reasonable for a backpacking boot.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Weight

Our scale recorded 20.0 oz (567g) in a men's US size 9 which is on par with the brand's other boots like the Scarpa Terra GTX and the Scarpa Boreas GTX.

Scarpa among backpacking boots boot weight

For the amount of technologies and high-quality materials packed into the Rush TRK, we consider its weight to be fair.

Test results
among backpacking boots 20.00 oz (567g)
Average 18.45 oz (523g)
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
11.71 oz (332g)
Weight
28.29 oz (802g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

The among backpacking boots is a chunky beast that boasts a 41.8 mm heel stack. This is notably higher than our current lab average which leaves us with plenty of protective foam and rubber underfoot. As a result, our landings felt safe as our heels were kept high above the trail hazards like sharp rocks and sticking roots.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Heel stack caliper

The among backpacking boots almost entirely muted out any sense of the trail which really helped in staving off soreness and foot fatigue. That said, for hikers who prefer a more grounded boot when traversing difficult terrains, we suggest checking out the Scarpa Terra GTX as an alternative.

Test results
among backpacking boots 41.8 mm
Average 36.3 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
26.2 mm
Heel stack
46.9 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot, on the other hand, isn't quite as elevated. At 22.3 mm, the among backpacking boots's stack falls more in line with the average.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Forefoot stack caliper

But that was still enough to protect our feet from impact or harsh objects underfoot while also giving us a fair amount of ground feel for intuitive toe-offs.

Test results
among backpacking boots 23.3 mm
Average 22.5 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
17.0 mm
Forefoot stack
30.7 mm

Drop

Difference in midsole softness in cold.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Drop

This higher-than-average drop elevated our heels above the toes, maximising heel cushioning and ankle support.

We believe that most hikers with heavy backpacks will appreciate this setup on a multi-day hike because it engages foot and ankle muscles much less. This, in turn, helps to minimise fatigue in the long haul.

Test results
among backpacking boots 18.5 mm
Average 13.8 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
2.6 mm
Drop
20.9 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Plush cushioning doesn't make sense in a backpacking boot as it could do more harm than good. You need a firmer platform to rely on when navigating tricky terrain.

Pressing our durometer against the shoe's primary cushioning foam returned 29.6 HA. This is about 10% firmer than average but is on oar with other backpacking boots we've tested in the lab.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Midsole softness durometer
Test results
among backpacking boots 29.6 HA
Average 27.3 HA
But thats not all.
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
15.4 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
53.3 HA

Difference in midsole softness in cold

Gladly, that foam doesn't get much harder in cold conditions!

Scarpa among backpacking boots Difference in midsole softness in cold

After keeping the among backpacking boots in the freezer for 20 minutes and retaking the durometer measurement, we recorded a mere 9.3% difference! It is notably lower than the average of hiking boots.

Test results
among backpacking boots 9.3%
Average 19.1%
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in midsole softness in cold
100%

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

But if the Scarpa Rush TRK is so firm, where does all that comfort and impact protection come from? The secret lies in the boot's dual-density midsole.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Secondary foam softness durometer

Those red inserts under the heels and balls of the foot are made of much softer foam, a whopping 74% softer, to be precise!

This component is a much-needed touch of responsiveness to the otherwise pretty unforgiving setup.

Test results
among backpacking boots 17.0 HA
Average 44.3 HA
But thats not all.

Insole thickness

Another important component of the boot's underfoot experience is a well-padded insole.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Insole thickness

Measuring its thickness with a calliper, we got 5.8 mm in the heel. This is similar to the other hiking boot insoles we've checked.

Test results
among backpacking boots 5.8 mm
Average 6.1 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.7 mm
Insole thickness
10.7 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

We were amazed at the incredible side-to-side containment of the among backpacking boots as well as the confidence it inspires for backpacking adventures on challenging terrain.

Coming from a brand that is obsessed with technical footwear for the mountains, this Scarpa boot has met all of our high-set expectations in terms of lateral support and stability.

Torsional rigidity

The boot's ultra-rigid construction leaves no chance to ankle rolls. Attempting to twist it in our manual test, we felt no give whatsoever!

mm, and the!

The Rush TRK's high-cut collar, stiff upper, firm sole, and sturdy plastic DST (Dynamic Stabiliser Torsion) frame all created cast-like support that never once allowed our ankles to buckle.

Scarpa among backpacking boots DST (Dynamic Stabilizer Torsion) frame

Test results
among backpacking boots 5
Average 4.3
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Difference in stiffness in cold

The stiff and structured heel counter of the Scarpa among backpacking boots further enhanced a death grip around our heels and ankles.

On a 1-5 scale, where 5 is the stiffest heel counter among hiking boots, our manual push-and-squeeze test returned a clear 5!

But that's not all...

Scarpa among backpacking boots 3D Auto-fit Ankle Collar

If you look at the boot's half-cut upper, you will see a bumpy area where the ankle bone sits inside the boot. That is Scarpa's so-called 3D Auto-fit Ankle Collar or moulded foam. It complements the boot's rigid heel collar with plush and padded support from inside the Rush TRK.

Test results
among backpacking boots 5
Average 3.5
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Difference in stiffness in cold
5

Midsole width in the forefoot

Compared to most other rugged backpacking boots, the Scarpa among backpacking boots has a rather moderate platform width.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Midsole width in the forefoot

It doesn't extend past the average, showing a typical 110.3 mm measurement on our calliper. For reference, the Salomon Quest 4 GTX comes in at 116.5 mm, and the s airy mesh upper, on the other hand, is much better suited for hot days showed 117.0 Warm and watertight upper.

Test results
among backpacking boots 110.3 mm
Average 111.6 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
96.3 mm
Midsole width in the forefoot
124.6 mm

Midsole width in the heel

The heel portion of the among backpacking boots's sole does not go past the average either. The boot checked in at the standard 87.0 mm in the widest part of the heel.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Midsole width in the heel

We found that the boot's slimmer profile did not compromise stability at all but instead helped the Rush TRK shave off some bulk!

Test results
among backpacking boots 87.0 mm
Average 87.9 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
71.7 mm
Midsole width in the heel
106.1 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

If you only approve of the stiffest boots for traversing rocky trails with a heavy load, the Scarpa among backpacking boots proved to be one of the least flexible options on our roster!

It takes 60% more force than average to bend this Scarpa boot to a 90-degree angle! Our force gauge returned 70.6 while the average hovers around 40-45N.

Scarpa among backpacking boots stiff sole

Test results
among backpacking boots 70.6N
Average 44.3N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
16.6N
Stiffness
84.7N

Grip / Traction

Lug depth

The Scarpa among backpacking boots is studded with deep 4.0 mm lugs which proved its effectiveness in the most demanding trail conditions.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Lug depth caliper

Hiking on rocky paths and gravel, squelching through mud, and stepping on moss-covered logs all felt very secure thanks to the boot's grippy outsole.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Lug depth tread
Test results
among backpacking boots 4.0 mm
Average 4.2 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.0 mm
Lug depth
5.8 mm

Size and fit

Toebox width at the widest part

The among backpacking boots's toebox is quite spacious compared to the average hiking boot, measuring 104.3 mm wide at its widest point according to our calliper. As such, the among backpacking boots should comfortably accommodate most hikers, especially those prone to swelling during long hikes or those with broad feet. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Toebox width at the widest part

That said, this extra internal real estate isn't as suitable for narrow-footed hikers as their feet might shift around within the boot, especially during descents on uneven terrain. This can lead to discomfort and/or blisters so we highly recommend trying on the boot as sizing down might be necessary.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Toebox width at the widest part standing

Alternatively, the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid GTX is a better option for those in need of a more snug and locked-in fit for their outdoor adventures. 

Test results
among backpacking boots 104.3 mm
Average 101.8 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
95.5 mm
Toebox width at the widest part
110.2 mm

Toebox width at the big toe

The among backpacking boots's toebox tapers quite significantly towards the big toe, becoming 78.8 mm wide in this part of the boot according to our caliper measurements. This is still on par with our current lab average and gives us a good amount of room to splay out without feeling too constricted within the boot. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Toebox width at the big toe
Test results
among backpacking boots 78.8 mm
Average 78.4 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
67.6 mm
Toebox width at the big toe
91.1 mm

Tongue: gusset type

As is typically the case with waterproof hiking boots, the among backpacking boots's tongue is fully gusseted on both sides. Not only does this prevent water from seeping in, but it also protects our feet from any bits of grit or debris that might make their way into the boot. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Tongue: gusset type
Test results
among backpacking boots Both sides (full)

Comfort

Tongue padding

Using our calliper, we measured the among backpacking boots's tongue to be 9.5 mm thick. While this is a little shy of our current lab average, it still leaves us with plenty of a buffer between our feet and the laces.

Scarpa among backpacking boots Tongue padding caliper

As such, it feels very comfortable across our instep, with lace bite never being an issue during our test hikes no matter how tightly we cinched up the boot. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Tongue padding laces
Test results
among backpacking boots 9.5 mm
Average 11.2 mm
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
5.9 mm
Tongue padding
22.3 mm

Heel tab

The among backpacking boots has a convenient finger loop at the heel that makes sliding the boot on feel a little quicker and smoother. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Heel tab
Test results
among backpacking boots Finger loop

Removable insole

The insole isn't glued in so replacing it with an aftermarket alternative or a custom orthotic is possible if necessary. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Removable insole
Test results
among backpacking boots Yes

Misc

Reflective elements

The among backpacking boots doesn't feature any reflective elements in its construction. We, therefore, recommend using additional high-vis gear for better night-time visibility in situations where it is required. 

Scarpa among backpacking boots Reflective elements
Test results
among backpacking boots No