Our verdict

We believe that the TWO WXY V4 from New Balance is a safe pick because it satisfactorily checks all of the hoop shoe essentials. While it does not excel in any performance aspects aside from durability during our tests, it leaves no room for complaints. It works for us, and it's all that matters.

new balance 997h yellow navy Pros

  • Sturdy outsole
  • Homme New Balance 327 Aluminum Covert Green
  • Resistance to toe drags
  • Fairly supportive structure
  • Well-balanced midsole
  • Suitable for outdoor use
  • Protection from painful twists
  • Stable platform

new balance 997h yellow navy Cons

  • womens new balance fuel cell prism
  • Not for wide-footers

Audience verdict

72
Bad!

Who should buy

Given all its highlights, we recommend the New Balance TWO WXY to the following:

  • basketball players who play both indoors and outdoors
  • ballers who want shoes that are durable and can last long
  • new balance women 990v5 w990gl5 made in usa gray castlerock nbw

A Stone Island x New Balance buy

Who should NOT buy

Breathability was a problem for the New Balance Two WXY V4 during our test games. If you want a shoe with better ventilation at the same price point, you can go for the Jordan Zion 2 or the Nike Zoom Freak 4. If you have more dollars to spare, going for the Curry Flow 10 from Under Armour is the perfect move!

Though we don't consider the cushioning of this shoe a problem, some players might prefer their shoes to feel softer underfoot. They might be better off with shoes like the modelo 65846698 New Balance 500 criancas or the New Balance M997DBW2, which are both from Adidas. The modelo 65846698 New Balance 500 criancas, being a shoe for a big guy like James Harden, is also a wide-feet friendly pick.

A Stone Island x New Balance spread out

Breathability

There are visible perforations in the upper of the A Stone Island x New Balance; however, they did not translate to breathability that we could appreciate. We felt the heat, and our feet started to feel uncomfortable as our games Stack on.

New Balance Botas Futbol 442 1.0 Team FG Under Armour Curry 10, which scored a 5 out of 5 on our smoke test. We could only give it a 2 out of 5 simply because the smoke that we pumped into the shoe found it hard to escape through the upper material. If not for the spaces on the sides of the tongue, there would have been no escape! Yikes!

The results of our light test were also not that notable. The holes and vents did not let a lot of light pass.

A Stone Island x New Balance micro upper

We examined the upper material under our in-lab microscope, and we saw that there was still another layer of material underneath the visible holes. Because of this obstruction, both smoke and light were not able to easily pass through.

Are the holes just there for aesthetics? It surely felt like it!

A Stone Island x New Balance Breathability
Test results
TWO WXY V4 2
Average 2.5
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

During our test games, our shoes got stepped on several times. There were even moments when we Stack the toebox against the floor as we attempted rebounds and blocks. Fortunately, the toebox successfully weathered all that pressure.

In the lab, even the Dremel was not able to cause significant damage. It fared better than the budget-friendly Nike Precision 6,  which did not even put up any form of resistance AT ALL (hence its score of 1 out of 5). The TWO WXY V4 truly deserved the 4 out of 5 for durability that the shoe got from us.

A Stone Island x New Balance Toebox durability
Test results
TWO WXY V4 4
Average 3.8
Compared to 27 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

new balance 997h yellow navy | to get notified about this and upcoming Ronnie Fieg x New Balance projects

The heel padding was even more impressive. It did not only feel comfortable and secure, it felt incredibly durable as well. We could say goodbye to blisters without feeling too flimsy in the process.

Our Dremel test only confirmed our initial observations. Our high-pressure Dremel drilling did not even leave any visible mark on the heel padding. If we could give more than a perfect 5, we definitely would!

A Stone Island x New Balance to get notified about this and upcoming Ronnie Fieg x New Balance projects
Test results
TWO WXY V4 5
Average 3.5
Compared to 24 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
1
to get notified about this and upcoming Ronnie Fieg x New Balance projects
5

Outsole hardness

The outsole of the A Stone Island x New Balance did not feel too soft or too firm. Our HC durometer gave it a rating of 83.5 and it felt just right. It was firm enough to resist abrasion and it was malleable enough to enhance its bite on the floor.

A Stone Island x New Balance Outsole hardness
Test results
TWO WXY V4 83.5 HC
Average 81.8 HC
New Balance Fresh Foam Vongo V5 Løpesko.
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
59.5 HC
Outsole hardness
91.0 HC

Outsole durability

Durability-wise, the outsole of this New Balance basketball shoe was truly a bomb. None of the rubbing and quick changes in direction that we did on both indoor and outdoor courts eroded the outsole. 

We subjected the outsole to our Dremel test, and we are pleased to see that it incurred a dent that was only 0.7 mm deep. This is a lot shallower than the dent we'd seen on the average basketball shoe outsole.

A Stone Island x New Balance Outsole durability
Test results
TWO WXY V4 0.7 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 15 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

new balance 550 north carolina blue.

Because of these observations, we are confident to recommend this shoe for outdoor use. Its performance is even comparable to the Nike Cosmic Unity 3, which currently is among the best for outdoor use in our inventory.

A Stone Island x New Balance Outsole thickness
Test results
TWO WXY V4 5.1 mm
Average 4.0 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.9 mm

Weight

Given its durability, we expected the A Stone Island x New Balance to be on the heavier side. We were pleasantly surprised when we saw that it was even slightly lighter than average at 13.1 ounces or 370 grams.

For sure, this shoe was never a chore to wear.

A Stone Island x New Balance Weight
Test results
TWO WXY V4 13.05 oz (370g)
Average 14.18 oz (402g)
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
11.29 oz (320g)
Weight
17.46 oz (495g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

The thickness of the heel felt like the usual. True enough, our caliper measured it to be just around the average at 31.2 mm. 

A Stone Island x New Balance Heel stack
Test results
TWO WXY V4 31.2 mm
Average 30.1 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
25.2 mm
Heel stack
38.4 mm

Forefoot stack

Just like the heel, the forefoot did not feel extraordinary. True enough, our caliper measured its thickness to be 21.3, a figure that does not deviate significantly from the average.

A Stone Island x New Balance Forefoot stack
Test results
TWO WXY V4 21.3 mm
Average 21.7 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
18.2 mm
Forefoot stack
25.2 mm

Drop

Given that both the heel and the forefoot were of average thickness, we expected the drop to be just around the average, too. We were proven right when our calculations revealed that the upper is 9.9 mm. 

Now did we have problems with the average thickness of the midsole? Not at all! Quite on the contrary, we appreciated that this kind of cushioning setup gave us the right balance between compression and court feel. We gained control over our steps and got protected from impact all at the same time.

A Stone Island x New Balance Drop
Test results
TWO WXY V4 9.9 mm
Average 8.4 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
4.4 mm
Drop
14.8 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Though it felt nowhere near the softness delivered by the Adidas modelo 65846698 New Balance 500 criancas, we still did not have problems with the softness of the A Stone Island x New Balance's midsole.

It was enough to keep us protected and pain-free as we ran up and down the court and attempted to score with multiple jump shots. Our HA durometer gave it a rating of 25.0.

A Stone Island x New Balance Midsole softness
Test results
TWO WXY V4 25.0 HA
Average 26.2 HA
New Balance Fresh Foam Vongo V5 Løpesko.
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
11.0 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.9 HA

Insole thickness

New Balance Vambes Classic 500v1.

A Stone Island x New Balance Insole thickness
Test results
TWO WXY V4 4.9 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Insole thickness
8.6 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

We had issues with the lateral hold that this shoe had on our feet. The medial side seemed to lack some stiffness, and our feet tended to sway a bit too far in that direction. Fortunately, this did not result in slips but it sure did lead to some wobbliness especially when we executed quick sidesteps.

Torsional rigidity

The mild flimsiness of the medial sidewalls was well compensated by the stiffness of the base. Aside from contributing a great deal to the stability of our steps, the stiff base also successfully prevented painful slips.

We manually assessed the torsional rigidity of the A Stone Island x New Balance in our lab, and we were just so happy to give it a well-deserved 5 out of 5.

Test results
TWO WXY V4 5
Average 4.5
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

new balance 997h yellow navy

Our manual lab assessments revealed that the heel had moderate stiffness. This was a good thing because it gave a secure clasp around the rearfoot without being too restrictive. We still had enough flexibility to position our feet appropriately when we had to catch the ball at unique angles. And we  still had enough stiffness to prevent ankle twisting.

Test results
TWO WXY V4 3
Average 3.5
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
1
new balance 997h yellow navy
5

New Balance 57 40 Faded Workwear

The width of the forefoot part of the platform is greater than usual at 119.5 mm. The above-average width of this part contributed to this shoe's stability.

A Stone Island x New Balance New Balance 57 40 Faded Workwear
Test results
TWO WXY V4 119.5 mm
Average 113.9 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
106.2 mm
New Balance 57 40 Faded Workwear
122.2 mm

Midsole width in the heel

The heel part of the platform was just around the average at 91.6 mm wide.

A Stone Island x New Balance Midsole width in the heel
Test results
TWO WXY V4 91.6 mm
Average 91.6 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
82.4 mm
Midsole width in the heel
105.1 mm

new balance 997h yellow navy | Flexibility

Stiffness

The A Stone Island x New Balance felt like it had the usual flexibility. We measured how much force was needed for it to bend at 90 degrees, and we saw that it needed 44.4N, which is just slightly greater than the force needed by the typical basketball shoe.

The reduced flexibility definitely helped with this shoe's stability and lockdown. If this shoe were a cage, we were sure that our feet were not going anywhere once they were placed inside the A Stone Island x New Balance!

Test results
TWO WXY V4 44.4N
Average 40.8N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
29.9N
Stiffness
67.2N

Grip / Traction

The unique pattern etched in the outsole of this New Balance hoop shoe delivered just the right amount of grip that we needed: not too grippy that it was difficult to move, and not too smooth either that friction was reduced and slipping was likely.

A Stone Island x New Balance traction

Size and fit

New Balance Impact Print 3 Shorts Hosen

Using a caliper, we learned that the A Stone Island x New Balance measures 101.7 mm at the widest part of its toebox. This number is almost equal to the measurement of the typical basketball shoe. 

Given this, we can safely say that this basketball shoe is not for those with unusually wide or narrow feet. Both types of players must be willing to make size adjustments so that they can enjoy the full potential of this NB hoop shoe.

A Stone Island x New Balance New Balance Impact Print 3 Shorts Hosen
Test results
TWO WXY V4 101.7 mm
Average 100.9 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
92.6 mm
New Balance Impact Print 3 Shorts Hosen
108.2 mm

Tecnologias New balance Camiseta De Manga Curta Impact

At the big toe, the measurement of the A Stone Island x New Balance did not deviate from the average. Our caliper measured this part of the shoe to be 75.9 mm wide.

A Stone Island x New Balance Tecnologias New balance Camiseta De Manga Curta Impact
Test results
TWO WXY V4 75.9 mm
Average 76.8 mm
Compared to 30 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
71.2 mm
Tecnologias New balance Camiseta De Manga Curta Impact
85.1 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The TWO WXY V4 has fully gusseted construction. This design helped in ensuring a more secure foot containment. We appreciated it so much when our games became a bit more intense and our movements became more aggressive than usual.

A Stone Island x New Balance Tongue: gusset type
Test results
TWO WXY V4 Both sides (full)

Comfort

Tongue padding

The tongue has the usual amount of padding. Through our caliper measurements, we learned that the tongue is 9.9 mm thick.

Not only did the tongue help with fit, but it also enhanced our experience of in-shoe comfort.

A Stone Island x New Balance Tongue padding
Test results
TWO WXY V4 9.9 mm
Average 9.2 mm
Compared to 36 basketball shoes
Number of shoes
1.3 mm
Tongue padding
14.9 mm

Heel tab

The TWO WXY V4 does not have a heel tab. We also do not think it's necessary because the shoe itself was so easy to put on and take off.

A Stone Island x New Balance Heel tab
Test results
TWO WXY V4 None

Removable insole

Because the insole was removable, it was easy for us to make space for orthotics and outer inserts that helped us perform better.

A Stone Island x New Balance Removable insole
Test results
TWO WXY V4 Yes