Our verdict

Even though it gave us strong grandpa vibes, very few shoes offer as much support as the Shoes brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor. Approved by foot doctors, this shoe is gts with foot health in mind and even has the potential to relieve painful conditions like plantar fasciitis. Its stable construction helped our 8-hour workday feel like a breeze! The shoe's hard-wearing leather upper and rubber outsole help it outlast many other options of work footwear, while the austere design and basic colors allow it to blend into almost any occasion.

X Shoes brooks Beast La Bestia Pros

  • brooks adrenaline gts 10 mens
  • Broadly recommended by podiatrists
  • Incredible abrasion resistance and durability
  • Thick and lasting cushioning
  • Wide and steady platform
  • Great for cold and drizzly days
  • Comfortable in-shoe feel
  • True to size and fit
  • Can match formal work attire

X Shoes brooks Beast La Bestia Cons

  • Heavier than average
  • Quite stiff, needs breaking on
  • zapatillas de running Shoes brooks neutro talla 49.5 negras
  • Not breathable

Audience verdict

86
Good!

Who should buy

Having thoroughly tested the Shoes brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor, we can recommend it to people who:

  • need extra support for flat feet, overpronation, plantar fasciitis, diabetes, and other conditions (the shoe is podiatrist-approved and carries the A5500 code)
  • Ariel the entire day on their feet (be it casual wear or at work)
  • zapatillas de running Shoes brooks hombre constitución ligera talla 36.5
  • look for high-quality work footwear with basic color options to match their work outfits and uniforms

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor review

Who should NOT buy

If you love the idea of an exceptionally comfortable and supportive shoe but can't stand the stern vibes of the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor, check out the following alternatives from Shoes brooks:

All of these shoes are lighter, more breathable, more forgiving, and can be used for both walking and running.

But if you do need a leather shoe for work, preferably one with a slip-resistant outsole, the Eckige 'Brooks' Brille may be a better choice. It has a stronger grip on wet tiles and more joyous vibes despite the monochromatic colorways.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor lab test

Breathability

Brooks England Sadeltaske Scape Seat 8-10L.

As our in-house breathability test shows, there is pretty much no airflow happening inside the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor. Even though the tiny streak of vapor found its way through the eyelets, this pathway won't be very much available with the foot inside the shoe.

Even when we tried searching for ventilation holes in our transparency test, we didn't find a single aperture in the shoe's upper.

It would be wise to save this option for cooler days (50°F/20°C and below) if you want to avoid toasty and sweaty feet.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 1
Average 2.8
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

X Shoes brooks Beast La Bestia | Leather/Suede quality

Testing the toebox part of the shoe with a butane torch and a scratch awl, we found that it is indeed made of real full-grain leather.

At first glance, it looks like the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor uses the same kind of leather throughout the upper. But alas, Shoes brooks cuts corners on the material quality in the midfoot.

As you can see, the upper caught fire and melted instantly revealing the material's synthetic nature.

Apparently, it is no longer possible to get a real leather shoe for $130 these days.

Toebox durability

But there are two sides to the coin. What causes the shoe's lack of aeration also makes it incredibly wear-resistant.

As our 12-second Dremel test shows, the full-grain leather of the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor doesn't give up so easily. It didn't let our tool leave more than a scuff on the topmost layer of its toebox material.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Toebox durability comparison

Compared to a typical mesh upper, this Shoes brooks shoe will take much more abuse before it starts to show serious signs of wear.

Thus, we readily award the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor with the highest toebox durability score - 5 out of 5!

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 5
Average 3.1
Compared to 23 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

zapatillas de running Shoes brooks hombre verdes entre 60 y 100

The shoe continues to show outstanding durability in its inner lining as well!

A 4-second exposure to sandpaper at a 5K RPM speed only tickled the shoe's textile.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor zapatillas de running Shoes brooks hombre verdes entre 60 y 100 comparison

Considering that most shoe linings end up with glaring holes after the same test, the inner fabric of this Shoes brooks shoe deserves a high durability score of 4 out of 5.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 4
Average 2.3
Compared to 22 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
zapatillas de running Shoes brooks hombre verdes entre 60 y 100
5

Outsole hardness

At the bottom, the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor is protected with a promisingly substantial rubber outsole.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Outsole hardness

Pressing our Shore C durometer against it returned a higher-than-average reading of 84.5 HC. It is a pretty hard compound that looks like it can take a beating.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 84.5 HC
Average 76.0 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
50.1 HC
Outsole hardness
92.0 HC

Outsole durability

To test the limits of the shoe's outsole, we ramped up the Dremel speed to 10K RPM and extended the exposure to 22 seconds.

And yet again, the shoe impressed us with its ability to resist abrasion!

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Outsole durability test

That barely visible scratch you see on the rubber is a mere 0.9 mm deep according to our tread gauge. That's notably shallower than the average of walking shoes.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 0.9 mm
Average 1.5 mm
Compared to 22 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

On top of it all, the shoe's rubber outsole is a whopping 5.5 mm thick!

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Outsole thickness

We are confident that the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor will outlast many options on the market. Even if you walk on concrete and asphalt all day and power through 8-10-hour shifts on your feet, this Shoes brooks shoe is one of the most long-lasting walking shoes we've tested.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 5.5 mm
Average 2.8 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
7.0 mm

Weight

Being a well-cushioned and highly supportive shoe with a leather upper, it is no surprise that the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor comes with an extra heft.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Weight

Weighing it in a men's US size 9, we got 13.7 oz (388g) on the scale. That's about 4 oz (113g) heavier than the average walking shoe.

brooks revel 2 running.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 13.69 oz (388g)
Average 9.74 oz (276g)
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
6.17 oz (175g)
Weight
14.25 oz (404g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

The Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor treated our feet to a thick-foamed and very well-cushioned sole.

Measuring its stack height with a caliper, we got 35.7 mm in the heel. The shoe did feel quite platformy underfoot.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Heel stack

But it also remained incredibly comfortable and supportive for hours on end. We wore the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor for a few days in our shoe-testing lab where we barely sat down to rest. It was amazing to find that our feet and legs didn't feel beaten up at all! 

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 35.7 mm
Average 32.1 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
11.2 mm
Heel stack
45.7 mm

Forefoot stack

X Shoes brooks Beast La Bestia.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Forefoot stack

This is largely due to its thicker-than-average forefoot stack of 23.5 mm.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 23.5 mm
Average 21.6 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
5.5 mm
Forefoot stack
31.2 mm

Drop

Looking at the heel-to-toe drop of the Addition Walker 2, we found that it is a bit steeper than average at 12.2 mm.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Drop

It is a pretty common setup for supportive shoes that are meant to ease the strain of certain foot conditions.

The elevated heel takes the load off the Achilles and enhances impact protection in the rearfoot.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 12.2 mm
Average 10.5 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.3 mm
Drop
21.4 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

It is critical to note that the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor is NOT a plush walking shoe.

Pressing our durometer against its sliced midsole returned a reading of 25.9 HA which is the average of walking shoes in our lab.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Midsole softness

It indicates a moderately soft foam that doesn't have a whole lot of squeeze and is certainly not a mushy one.

Brooks uses a proprietary BioMoGo DNA foam which is a pretty comfortable EVA-based compound. It doesn't have much bounce to it, but we enjoyed the consistent ride it delivered for hours on end.

It is a great option for painful foot conditions like plantar fasciitis where a plush and wobbly midsole can do more harm than good. A thicker and firmer sole is also beneficial for heavyweight wearers.

As a nice bonus, "Bio" implies that the foam is biodegradable and, according to Shoes brooks, it breaks down 20 times faster than your typical foam.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 25.9 HA
Average 24.9 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 28 walking shoes
Number of shoes
7.8 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
32.9 HA

Difference in midsole softness in cold

Another positive characteristic of the BioMoGo DNA is that it doesn't get much firmer in low temperatures.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Difference in midsole softness in cold

After keeping the shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes and retaking the durometer measurement, we found that the shoe's foam got moderately firmer - by 20.7%.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 20.7%
Average 34.1%
Compared to 28 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in midsole softness in cold
100%

Insole thickness

The shoe's midsole is topped off with a nicely padded insole that is a good 5.5 mm thick.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Insole thickness
Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 5.5 mm
Average 6.1 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Insole thickness
16.9 mm

Stability

Brooks England B66 B67 Flyer Countess Conquest Седла Standard Left Rear Coil

If you are someone with flat feet, overpronation, or other foot conditions that call for extra-supportive footwear, the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor must be on your radar.

The shoe features an Extended Progressive Diagonal Bar (PDRB) in the midfoot portions of the sole. Even though it looks a bit dated compared to the subtle stability free of today, it is still one of the most reliable types of arch support.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Extended Progressive Diagonal Bar (PDRB)

We found that this sturdy post supports our arch in the right spot minimizing our foot's inward rolling.

What's more, the Addiction Walker has earned a solid reputation among podiatrists over the years. It even received a Seal of Acceptance from the American Podiatry Medical Association (APMA) as one that What is the Shoes brooks Levitate 6 Best For.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor support

Torsional rigidity

The Shoes brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor offers an unmatched level of stability with its sturdy midsole posting and supportive upper.

zapatillas de running Shoes brooks neutro constitución ligera ritmo medio talla 42.

Rating the shoe's torsional rigidity on a 1-5 scale, we gave it the highest possible score of 5.

It makes the shoe very safe and reliable not only for people with foot conditions but also for senior citizens for whom a solid footing is a must.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 5
Average 2.7
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

Another source of support comes from the shoe's moderately rigid heel counter. It received an average score of 3 out of 5 in our manual stiffness test.

Even though it's not the sturdiest we've seen in our lab, the heel counter has enough structure to keep our heels and ankles securely in place. There was no slipping out or sliding around inside the heel cup.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor heel counter

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 3
Average 2.2
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Brooks Greenlight Tight 7 Short

Last but not least, the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor draws its stability from a slightly wider-than-average base.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Shoes brooks Greenlight Tight 7 Short

The media side of the Shoes brooks Gray Lady Adrenaline GTS 17.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 113.7 mm
Average 111.6 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
98.8 mm
Brooks Greenlight Tight 7 Short
124.1 mm

Midsole width in the heel

As for the heel of the shoe, we measured 95.8 mm in its widest part. That is more than 5 mm wider than average.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Midsole width in the heel

zapatillas de running Shoes brooks apoyo talón blancas.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 95.8 mm
Average 89.9 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
75.6 mm
Midsole width in the heel
104.0 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

Do expect a much stiffer experience in the Shoes brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor compared to your typical walking shoe, especially at the toe-off!

Its unforgiving construction was one of the first things we noticed about the shoe.

Measuring how much force it takes to bend this Shoes brooks shoe to a 90-degree angle, our force gauge showed a high reading of 31.3N. That's a whopping 50% more than it takes on average!

The Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor does get more pliable with time but stays on the stiff side anyway.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 31.3N
Average 20.4N
zapatillas de running Shoes brooks voladoras maratón negras.
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1.1N
Stiffness
52.7N

Brooks brothers хлопковая рубашка в клетку

And if you plan to wear the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor in cold weather, expect that it to get even stiffer.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Shoes brooks brothers хлопковая рубашка в клетку

Having kept the shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes, we repeated the force gauge measurement and found that it stiffened up by 20%.

Luckily, it's not as much as some other walking shoes change (up to 50% stiffer!).

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 19.9%
Average 48.4%
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Brooks brothers хлопковая рубашка в клетку
139%

I Shoes brooks Power Pro $32.00 s-xl

The Shoes brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor proudly carries a certified slip-resistant rubber outsole (SATRA TM144:2011). We were happy with the traction it delivered on most surfaces like concrete, wood, and dry tiles of our shoe lab.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor outsole

But when it came to wet tiles... it turned out that the shoe's slip resistance was not enough! We wouldn't recommend it for kitchen and restaurant workers. You want to look towards the Eckige 'Brooks' Brille for that purpose.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor slip resistant

Another unfortunate discovery we had with the Addition Walker 2's outsole is that it squeaks quite a bit! Our colleagues could hear us approaching from the other room of the warehouse.

Size and fit

Internal length

We can confirm that the Shoes brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor runs true to size in our regular men's US size 9.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Internal length

We also measured the shoe's internal length down to a millimeter (272.7 mm). It matches the men's US size 9 precisely, according to Brooks' shoe size chart.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor on foot

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 272.7 mm

zapatillas de running Shoes brooks neutro talla 41 azules mejor valoradas

The Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor also proved to be on point with its toebox fit and felt tailor-made on our medium-sized feet.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor fit

Measuring the widest part of its forefoot with a caliper, we got 101.8 mm. It is exactly on par with the average.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor zapatillas de running Shoes brooks neutro talla 41 azules mejor valoradas
Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 101.8 mm
Average 99.2 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
zapatillas de running Shoes brooks neutro talla 41 azules mejor valoradas
110.9 mm

Toebox width at the big toe

As a shoe that promotes foot health, the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor has a reasonable toebox shape. There is no aggressive tapering towards the front which is so common for dress shoes.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Toebox width at the big toe

Measuring its toebox width at the big toe, our caliper showed 77.3 mm which is a standard reading for D-medium walking shoes.

Fortunately, this Shoes brooks shoe caters to people with wide feet too, offering wide and extra-wide options.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 77.3 mm
Average 78.8 mm
Compared to 24 walking shoes
Number of shoes
73.7 mm
Toebox width at the big toe
94.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

We found that there are no gussets on the shoe's tongue.

zapatillas de running Shoes brooks moradas baratas menos de 60 Brooks Shoes brooks Bedlman 2 Running Shoes and were hoping to see it on the Addiction Walker as well.

Even though a gusseted tongue would make the lockdown even more secure and eliminate tongue-shifting, it's not an essential part of a walking shoe anyways.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor None

Comfort

Tongue padding

Offering a ton of cushioning underfoot, the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor also spoiled our feet with its generous in-shoe padding.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Tongue padding

We measured its thickness at 10.4 mm which is twice as thick as the average.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor 10.4 mm
Average 5.2 mm
Compared to 29 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.3 mm
Tongue padding
11.5 mm

Heel tab

We think that the Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor could benefit from a pull tab of a finger loop to assist in the on-and-off (especially for senior wearers).

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Heel tab
Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor None

Removable insole

If you wish to customize the in-shoe experience, you can replace the shoe's stock insole with our own. It is quite easy to take out.

Brooks Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Removable insole
Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Yes

Misc

Reflective elements

Small patches on the shoe's heels improve its visibility in low-light conditions.

Test results
Lindens Hansons-Brooks teammate and 2018 Boston competitor Yes