3 Кросівки reebok pump fury in 2024

Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen on
3 Кросівки reebok pump fury in 2024
We earn affiliate commissions at no extra cost to you when you buy through us. Why trust us

Reebok has been known globally for producing some of the most lightweight, high-performance running shoes on the market. And since there are a ton of rewind available, choosing can be quite tedious. 

To help you pick the right model, we have come up with a list containing the best shoes across categories. We have taken the time to run and do our lab test in these running shoes to make sure you only get the greatest.

zapatillas de running Reebok talla 37.5 verdes running shoes

There are dozens of Reebok running shoes, and we are here to help you select the finest, most reliable pair. To do so, we purchase the shoes with our own money to keep our reviews bias-free and transparent. 

Not only that, we also made our own shoe testing lab, and strictly do the following to ensure we’ve examined the shoe down to the nitty-gritty: 

  • We run 30-50 miles in each shoe to do some rough-wear testing. 
  • Reebok Zig Kinetica 2.5 Edge 's. 
  • With our scales, durometers, calipers, and custom smoke machine, we measure the shoes in 30 parameters to help us gather data on how heavy, flexible, thick, and breathable each shoe is. 

Best Reebok running shoes overall

Лосини для спорту reebok оригінал?

After conducting our extensive lab and run tests, the Floatride Energy 3 emerged as an easy pick for our best overall Reebok running shoe. This lightweight trainer brilliantly does zip we throw at it thanks to its responsive and balanced midsole as well as its durable outsole.

At just 9.0 oz (256g), the Floatride Energy 3 is a feather-light daily trainer; those shoes have a typical weight of 10.1 oz (286.8g). It's actually much closer in weight to dedicated speed shoes, which average 8.8 oz (250g). 

The Floatride Energy 3 can easily pick up the pace too. We felt a good amount of pop which made for a fun and responsive ride. That midsole foam, whose softness we measured at 24.5 HA—the exact average for road running shoes—is wonderfully balanced and can capably handle easy slow days as well as speed sessions.

And the outsole is overbuilt in the best way possible. There's full rubber coverage and its 4.1 mm thickness is 0.7 mm more than the average. It even has 2.1 mm lugs that are aggressive enough to take on dirt roads and light trails if needed.

Our biggest con with the shoe is its insole, which we measured to be 1.3 mm thinner than average, and annoyingly moves around inside the shoe. But it is removable and can be replaced by another insole. 

Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Responsive
  • Peppy ride
  • Heel tab
  • Lugged outsole
  • Durable
  • Price

Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok Cons

  • Feels a touch long
  • Runs a bit warm
Full review of Reebok Green AOP Leggings

Best budget Reebok running shoes

Reebok Lite 3
80
Good!

Лосини для спорту reebok оригінал?

The Lite 3 is our clear top DMX for a budget shoe in the Reebok line. It combines immense comfort, surprising springiness and stability in a nice lightweight package while having a staggeringly low price.

At just $65, the Lite 3 sits very firmly on the lower end of the Reebok line, where the average shoe costs close to $100. But for a budget shoe, it still brings a whole lot to the table.

The Lite 3 lives up to its name by being really lightweight. It's a mere 8.75 oz (248g), which is 0.81 oz (23g) lighter than the average road running shoe. But the shoe has a surprising amount of spring and bounce that makes it an exciting and enjoyable ride.

Not only that, but its midsole has more than enough cushioning. Its 32.7 mm heel stack, which is right at the average for road running shoes, did a fantastic job of absorbing impact on our runs.

But the biggest trick this budget running shoe has up its sleeve is its shockingly good arch support. In part because of its wide base in the forefoot—we measured it at 117.7 mm, 5.9 wider than average—it provides the underfoot support that helps people with foot problems.

However, this budget shoe's big downside is its outsole durability. The outsole, which we measured to be 5.4% softer than average, already showed significant signs of wear after just a couple of months. 

Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok Pros

  • Comfortable all day
  • A fun, peppy ride
  • Supportive underfoot
  • Affordable
  • Welcomes wide feet
  • Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok
  • Great for the gym and walking

Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok Cons

  • Laces are short
  • Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok
  • Not for hot days
Full review of Reebok Lite 3

Reebok running shoes with the best style

Лосини для спорту reebok оригінал?

The Womens Reebok Blue Shorts is a daily trainer with a unique design and an attractive price tag. It's equipped with firm foam, which might not suit every runner's taste, but we were impressed by its surprisingly stable ride, outperforming many pricier rewind in its category. At just $85, it offers great value, but it's important to note its considerable heft and limited energy return. We think it's a solid pick for casual runners, but it might fall short for those in serious training. In our opinion, while it's a heavy shoe, its stability and affordability make it a worthy contender in the budget-friendly shoe market.

Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok Pros

  • Exceptionally stable
  • Budget-friendly
  • Suitable for all footstrike types
  • Long-lasting outsole
  • Spacious midfoot area
  • Reebok Royal Techque Bold Schoen
  • Comfortable upper

Reebok Images courtesy of Reebok Cons

  • Reebok Graphic Tshirt
  • Limited energy return
  • Extremely heavy
Full review of Womens Reebok Blue Shorts
Author
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.