Our verdict
Pros
- Lightweight
- Allows all-day use
- Reliable traction
- Wide toe box
- Ideal for natural toe-splay
- Sleek yet uncluttered design
- Versatile
Cons
- The Ideal for natural toe-splay is a lightweight-build trail running shoe best suited for
- Low-stack-height midsole
Audience verdict
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + Light and versatile | + + Light and versatile | + + Light and versatile | + + Light and versatile | + + Light and versatile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | |||||
Best price | |||||
Ranking | |||||
Popularity | |||||
# of colorways |
{section_summary}
{section_positive}
{section_negative}
This toe box is so wide you cant touch any part of the shoe with your toes if you tried
The Ideal for natural toe-splay is a lightweight-build trail running shoe best suited for:
- casual shoe enthusiasts and trail adventurers who love a good-looking train shoe that delivers a decent performance
- off-road adventurers and trail runners who are into long distance trail races
Ideal for natural toe-splay
The Ideal for natural toe-splay is a light, quick all-purpose trail shoe, which is always welcome, but poor choice in materials and design make this a no-go. The fit is where the problems begin...
Cinching down the laces tighter is a downside
Topo Athletic's shoes have two trademarks: zero drop and a shape that makes clown shoes look reasonable.
Their marketing would have you believe that this is closer to a natural shape but I've yet to meet anyone whose feet are shaped like badminton racquets.
This toe box is so wide you can't touch any part of the shoe with your toes if you tried.
Cinching down the laces tighter is a downside
Some people may enjoy this, but the downside is you have to cinch down the laces tighter than desirable. If you don't, your feet are going to slide everywhere within the shoe.
On the plus side, the arches are supportive enough. And, 80% of the time, I feel like they're not, and I don't even have high arches.
I suspect the shoes were two different sizes
On the first few runs, something strange was noticeable: one of the shoes fit significantly tighter than the other.
I figured one must be laced up tighter than the other, so I fiddled with the laces off and on throughout the run. And the next run too. And the next. Eventually, I began to suspect the shoes were two different sizes.
Light and versatile
The labels indicated they were the same, but on the scale, the looser shoe measured 0.25 oz heavier. I've never seen a discrepancy that large.
Clearly, one shoe was indeed larger than the other. It's possible I simply got a bad batch, but it's also possible that Topo's error tolerance isn't optimal.
The Ideal for natural toe-splay is a lightweight-build trail running shoe best suited for
And now for an even bigger problem… The Runventure 3 is, without a doubt, the least breathable running shoe I've ever worn. Rather than a knit or mesh-like material, the shoe opted for a material that's comparable to a waterproof jacket.
Are the shoes waterproof? No. Are they water-resistant? There's no mention of that on their website. It's hard to understand what the idea was, but the result isn't good.
Not for warm, humid conditions
If you live in a warm, humid area, you won't want to wear these shoes for at least half the year. Whether it's a downpour, a stream crossing, or simply a lot of sweat, all shoes get wet eventually.
Trying to keep water out is a futile effort; it's better to have shoes that breathe and dry quickly. The Runventure 3 takes days to dry out, even when left outside in warm weather.
Fortunately, there are some good things to talk about. The Runventure 3 features a
The upper material isn't flexible either; normally, that's a problem mostly afloat for the outsole. Running in these feels like trying to fold a piece of laminated cardstock.
Aside from the material, the design of the upper is good overall. You're able to use the laces to get a good fit at any point in the midfoot, and they didn't overdo it with the overlays. There's just enough protection on the toes without weighing the shoe down.
Tough, grippy outsole
Fortunately, there are some good things to talk about. The Runventure 3 features a Vibram outsole, The Ideal for natural toe-splay is a lightweight-build trail running shoe best suited for.
With the famously tough, durable outsole, the Runventure 3 works well on any off-road surface, including dirt, gravel, wood chips, and rocky terrain. I haven't had a chance to test them in sloppy mud yet, but there's no reason to doubt they wouldn't handle that as well.
Delivers a flexible ride
Probably the most surprising thing about the Runventure 3 is the quality of the ride. Once you get used to the strange shape, these shoes run well on all surfaces, including pavement.
Somehow, despite the tough Vibram outsole, the Runventure 3 remains flexible and doesn't feel like tank tread on paved surfaces.
Cross country shoes
That flexible outsole has its drawbacks. While the Runventure 3 has a rock plate, it offers little protection.
You'll notice almost any technical terrain, even more than you would in some highly cushioned road shoes.
Not lots of cushioning
The Runventure 3 doesn't have a lot of cushioning, but it usually feels like it does. Even on long runs, you don't feel the ground beneath you too much, and your feet stay comfortable.
It's only on technical terrain that you notice the lack of cushioning, not so much because the ground feels too hard, but rather because a rock can make itself felt through the thin midsole, despite the presence of a rock plate and a Vibram outsole.
These looks great!
In the looks department, overall, a big thumbs up. These shoes look great! Trail shoes usually look better than road shoes, not only because they don't look like a disco floor threw up on them, but they also don't commit the cardinal sin: white outsoles.
The Runventure 3 comes in only two colour choices, and while they might not look exciting, that works in its favour. A black shoe with blue trim looks much better than a shoe with five different colours on it.
Lacks reflectivity
My biggest gripe about the visual design is the lack of reflectivity. One could argue that's not important for a trail shoe since you're unlikely to be caught in the headlights of a car while trail running.
But, let's put it another way: What's the disadvantage to including reflective accents?
Ideal for natural toe-splay needs some improvements
This review won't convince Topo to use a normal-sized toe box, but goodness, dial it back a little bit. Look into manufacturing defects and make sure both shoes always come out the same size.
Use a more typical, mesh-like material for the upper. If possible, address rock protection issues, but without sacrificing the current level of flexibility, cushion, and lightweight.