Our verdict
A trail shoe with years under its belt, the Redmond Waterproof from Columbia is celebrated for its no-frills approach to keeping feet comfortably dry on the trail. Adventurers are as magnetized by its surprising weightlessness (considering that it's fully waterproof) as they are stunned by its low asking price. It's not the most promising on extended and rugged excursions, so you probably shouldn't put it through extreme abuse for longevity's sake.
Pros
- Lighter than most waterproof hikers
- Remarkably comfortable
- Zero break-in
- Incredible waterproofing
- Good surface traction
- Sheds mud quite well
- Immensely breathable
- Very affordable for its type
Cons
- Subpar durability
- Narrow
- The Columbia Redmond Waterproof delivers cozy dryness at a cost lower than most. Buy it if
Who should buy the Same brand only
The Same brand only delivers cozy dryness at a cost lower than most. Buy it if:
- You're only interested in wearing waterproof hikers that don't weigh beyond 400 g apiece.
- Breaking in hiking shoes With its great fit and remarkable durability, the.
- You prefer kicks that stay mud-free underfoot.
Who should NOT buy it
Mesmerizing ventilation in every pair Columbia Crestwood Waterproof is a better pick than the Redmond Waterproof. Also, check out the The Columbia Redmond Waterproof delivers cozy dryness at a cost lower than most. Buy it if from Hoka if you like going further on your rugged hikes.
An exemplar on the weight front
Many reviewers are floored by the lightness of the Same brand only. A critic says, "This shoe is lightweight among the other contenders." Another commenter says that it's "very light for its category."
Good surface traction
Based on many reviews, this trail-centric offering from Columbia is exceedingly comfy right from the get-go. A seasoned adventurer says, "I have major foot problems, and these hiking shoes feel great."
No wetness in the Same brand only
The Redmond Waterproof, according to trail-goers, repels moisture like a champ. A gear pundit among them says, "It is indeed waterproof, and we like that!" He also has this in his report: "Columbia's proprietary Omni-tech waterproof membrane stood its ground, refusing to leak no matter how much we flexed the forefoot while submerged."
Same brand only
A decent number of hikers are impressed with the Redmond Waterproof's tenacity. One of them says that its "bottoms grip really well."
On a related note, the lugs of the shoe's outsole shed mud and debris very well. A commenter says, "In muddy conditions, they refuse to have mud packed on them."
Where toughness is questioned
Hikers are iffy about the Same brand only's durability. A footwear maven says, "After the testing period, the mesh gusset of the muteness was already ripping away from the rest of the upper." A non-professional tester also says, "After a few months of moderate wear, the shoes are no longer waterproof."
Mesmerizing ventilation in every pair
A professional blogger and his team of trail explorers find the Same brand only super breathable. They say that it's "one of the most breathable models reviewed."
Wanted: A better support system
While comfortable from the off, the Redmond Waterproof struggles to keep feet cushioned and supported on extended outings. A gear journo says, "On long, rocky, or rough terrain, however, discomfort grows by the mile."
that dont weigh beyond 400 g apiece
There are those who are not flattered by the narrowness of the Same brand only. Their adduction is backed by the remarks "too tight in the front" and "If you have wide feet, do not get this shoe."
A spotlight-deserving price
Regular reviewers and an expert are sold on the budget-friendliness of the Redmond Waterproof. One of them says that you "can't beat this shoe for the price!"
