Asics Contend 5 Ps | Our verdict

With the ASICS Asics Contend 5 Ps, the renowned stability line takes a spirited leap forward. With increased foam but without the low weight, it's a win-win for almost everyone. Navigating the balance between plush comfort and stability, in our tests, the FF Blast+ with 4D Guidance System midsole excels. While it might be on the pricier side and has lighter competitors, we think it's hard to find fault with this shoe.

Asics Contend 5 Ps Pros

  • Exceptionally cushioned
  • Impressively stable with 4D Guidance System
  • Lighter than it seems
  • Top-notch breathability
  • Effective maximalist design
  • Superior durability and comfort
  • Ideal for high-mileage runners
  • Asics Race High Waist Leggings Verde XL Mujer
  • Amazing build quality

Asics Contend 5 Ps Cons

  • Actual drop exceeds stated measurement
  • Asics Mallas High Waist 2

Audience verdict

89
Great!

Who should buy

In our opinion, the ASICS Asics Contend 5 Ps is the ideal choice for runners who:

  • are looking for a stability shoe with an incredible amount of foam.
  • desire a daily trainer that provides a smooth ride without the instability often found in some maximalist shoes.
  • are high-mileage enthusiasts in search of a stable, well-built, breathable shoe.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps

Who should NOT buy

The ASICS Asics Contend 5 Ps is the ideal choice for runners who prioritise stability and a plush ride. However, for runners who prioritise ground feel and a natural running sensation, we believe the Kayano 30 might not meet the expectations. Its substantial stack height combined with soft foam creates a muted ride. In those cases, we recommend the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 or the Saucony Tempus for a firmer, classic running feel.

Additionally, it's not our top pick for those seeking a lightweight stability shoe. While the Kayano 30 isn't heavy at all for its design, many runners don't require such monster cushioning and lean toward a lighter option. For those in this category, we think the agile Hoka Arahi 6 Running Club x ASICS.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps parts

Breathability

Expectations for the Kayano 30's performance were sky-high, especially given ASICS's track record of crafting top-notch uppers in terms of breathability and comfort—even in race-ready shoes like the Metaspeed Sky+.

We put the 30th iteration of the series designed by Toshikazu Kayano to the test and came away impressed. When subjected to our smoke test, the shoe demonstrated gorgeous breathability, earning a well-deserved 5/5.

This impressive airflow can be attributed to the shoe's thin engineered mesh upper. However, a closer—almost microscope-level—look reveals an interesting design choice.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps microscope

ASICS didn't opt for full ventilation holes, which can compromise structure and durability. Instead, they just removed the thickest part of the upper in those spots.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps microscope

This approach cleverly balances airflow while preventing potential tears, ensuring the shoe's long-lasting integrity.

Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 5
Average 3.8
Compared to 230 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

asics gt ii blackgreywhite Asics gel-sonoma 15-50 1201a438-001. Updates to the Asics Gel Fit Sana 3.

Upon reviewing the damage, we were thoroughly impressed. We gave it a 4/5 score and it's clear that ASICS delivered an exceptional upper with the Kayano 30.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Toebox durability
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 4
Average 2.4
Compared to 164 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Unfortunately, the heel padding doesn't hold up well and scored a 1/5 in our Dremel test.

It seems ASICS prioritised comfort in the heel area, opting for a softer material that won't irritate the sock or Achilles tendon. But this choice means the heel is more susceptible to premature wear and tear.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Heel padding durability
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 1
Average 3.2
Compared to 160 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

For the outsole, ASICS played it safe. They chose a rubber blend that's quite standard in terms of hardness (80.4 HC), aiming for a good mix of traction and durability.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps rubber

Although the outsole isn't entirely covered with rubber—to save on weight—it offers generous protection in key areas, especially for pronators.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Outsole hardness
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 80.4 HC
Average 80.5 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 281 running shoes
Number of shoes
52.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

We fired the Dremel one more time and the results were in line with our expectations.

As we've mentioned earlier, the rubber hardness is pretty standard, and the 0.9 mm indentation that we measured confirms it.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Outsole durability
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 0.9 mm
Average 0.9 mm
Compared to 142 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

The outsole boasts an impressive thickness of 4.3 mm. This result assures full lasting power throughout the shoe's lifespan.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Outsole thickness
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 4.3 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 300 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.6 mm

Weight

Weighing in at 10.7 oz (303g), we initially thought in the lab that this shoe was on the heavier side, especially after holding it in our hands. Yet, considering its expansive width and generous foam cushioning, it's genuinely remarkable that it comes in under 11 oz for a US size 9.

Compared to the Kayano 29, the Kayano 30 impressively offers richer padding inside and more cushioned FF Blast+ in the midsole—all while maintaining the same weight!

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Weight
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 10.69 oz (303g)
Average 9.35 oz (265g)
Compared to 301 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.26 oz (149g)
Weight
12.56 oz (356g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

Turning our attention to the midsole, the Kayano 30 boasts an impressive 39.7 mm of FF Blast+ in the heel. We're 100% sure that this stack height provides enough cushioning even in the longest runs.

FF Blast+ is ASICS' softest training foam. The Japanese brand also incorporates it into other top models like the Novablast 3 and the Cumulus 25.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Heel stack
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 39.7 mm
Average 33.6 mm
Compared to 300 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Heel stack
42.7 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot is generously padded, boasting a thickness of 27.7 mm, which is more than what most shoes offer.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Forefoot stack
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 27.7 mm
Average 24.9 mm
Compared to 300 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Forefoot stack
35.8 mm

Drop

Designed primarily as a stability shoe for heel-strikers, we found that the Kayano 30 features a 12-mm heel-to-toe drop—2 mm more than the brand indicates.

This doesn't pose any issues. In fact, it further suits heel-strikers and provides an option for midfoot and forefoot strikers looking to ease pressure on their Achilles and calves.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Drop
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 12.0 mm
Average 8.7 mm
Compared to 300 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.8 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Insole thickness

The Kayano series has always been synonymous with comfort, and a thick insole is part of the reason. Measuring in at 5.5 mm in our lab, it's another box checked.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Insole thickness
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 5.5 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 296 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Asics Contend 5 Ps | Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

FF Blast+ is renowned for its cloud-like feeling. With a measurement of 16.4 HA, we've confirmed it. Right from the initial run straight out of the box, the shoe was impressively soft.

ASICS also low a layer of PureGEL in the heel, which is their current implementation of the famous GEL. 

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps puregel

By adding this, the landing phase becomes even softer. However, considering its reduced importance in the Kayano 30 and other recent models, we believe ASICS may opt to exclude this technology in the near future.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Midsole softness
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 16.4 HA
Average 21.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 228 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.5 HA

Difference in midsole softness in cold

In colder temperatures, we noticed a change. Although the FF Blast+ foam remains softer than many other shoes, it does become noticeably firmer, registering at 24.1 HA.

Why does this issue arise? The FF Blast+ foam blends EVA with Olefin. As we've discussed before Asics gel-xalon 3, EVA foams often underperforms in cold temperatures.

Witnessing a 47.3% increase, the Kayano 30 clearly falls short when it's chilly out. ASICS really needs to address this, especially given the price tag of many of their FF Blast+ shoes.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Midsole softness in cold
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 47.3%
Average 25.6%
Compared to 227 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in midsole softness in cold
100%

Stability

Asics Running Patriot 12 Gule sneakers

The Kayano series has always focused on stability. Even with the significant cushioning in this thirtieth edition, we loved that it remains impressively stable.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps 4D Guidance

The new 4D Guidance System is the key regarding stability, using a softer foam right under the arch. It adjusted to the shape of our feet, providing consistent stability the more we wore the shoe.

Torsional rigidity

Torsional rigidity is another essential feature for great stability. ASICS, in our opinion, nails it for a daily trainer like this with a 4/5 score in our assessment. Anything less would risk stability, while a max score might feel too rigid for everyday runs.

Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 4
Average 3.2
Compared to 279 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

In the heel counter, we felt a similar sensation. However, for some runners, it might come across as slightly firm, although a 4/5 score is what we usually expect in a stability shoe.

Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 263 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width in the forefoot

Let's be clear—the Kayano 30 is W-I-D-E. We took the caliper in the lab to get a forefoot measurement of 124.3 mm, so it stands in the top 1% of shoes we've assessed in our lab for midsole width.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 124.3 mm
Average 113.7 mm
Compared to 301 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.5 mm
Midsole width in the forefoot
126.5 mm

Midsole width in the heel

Similarly, in the heel, we observe a width of 105.4 mm, placing it again among the top 1% we've measured.

Why does Kayano-san opt for this design? The answer is straightforward. With a tall stack and soft foam, he needed some aces up his sleeve for stability: the 4D Guidance System and... the shoe's broad width!

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 105.4 mm
Average 90.4 mm
Compared to 301 running shoes
Number of shoes
74.9 mm
Midsole width in the heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

In our 90-degree test, we applied just 25.0N of force to bend the shoe, showing its impressive flexibility—actually, it's more flexible than most shoes! This makes it super comfortable for long runs.

Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 25.0N
Average 29.1N
Asics Gel-Ptg Mt Sneakers Shoes 1193A155-100.
Compared to 283 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Stiffness
94.4N

Difference in stiffness in cold

After placing the shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes, we tested it again. We recorded a measurement of 30.1N—indicating an excellent result for us.

Indeed, with just a 20.4% uptick, we're assured of minimal stiffness variations across season-driven temperature fluctuations.

Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 20.4%
Average 36.2%
Compared to 283 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in stiffness in cold
148%

Size and fit

Internal length

ASICS stands out as one of the most consistent and reliable brands when it comes to quality control in shoe production.

Here's an example: we measured the internal length of the Kayano 30 to an impressively precise 270.4 mm. According to Asics' sizing charts, Ténis ASICS GEL-Kayano 27 preto prateado branco mulher!

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Internal length
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 270.4 mm
Average 269.2 mm
Compared to 164 running shoes
Number of shoes
259.9 mm
Internal length
280.4 mm

Toebox width at the widest part

We thought that with such a wide design, the shoe's upper would feel like a spacious mansion.

Well, we found it's pretty average at 99.8 mm. This clever design choice by Kayano-san enhances stability by ensuring the foot remains centred in the shoe's gigantic landing platform.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Toebox width at the widest part
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 99.8 mm
Average 98.4 mm
Compared to 301 running shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Toebox width at the widest part
109.1 mm

Toebox width at the big toe

We also measure the big toe area to get a feel for the toe cap's space. With a measurement of 78.6 mm, it remains consistent with the previous number.

It's slightly larger than many other shoes, but it doesn't qualify as a wide shoe. Nonetheless, good news is that ASICS does offer this shoe in a wide size option in most countries.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Toebox width at the big toe
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 78.6 mm
Average 78.2 mm
Compared to 175 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.4 mm
Toebox width at the big toe
92.5 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue it's semi-gusseted, which not only enhances the lockdown and prevents it from moving around the toes during our test runs. Good choice!

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps Both sides (semi)

Comfort

Tongue padding

Asics Gel-Quantum 180 VII 1201A631 001.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps tongue

While this is notably more than the average, some might expect even more, considering this shoe's focus on comfort. Yet, we appreciate this  choie—it provides ample cushioning without the burden of extra weight.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Tongue padding
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps 7.7 mm
Average 5.6 mm
Compared to 298 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Heel tab

ASICS decided against including a heel tab on the Kayano 30. While this aligns with the design cues of other recent ASICS models like the Novablast 3, we feel a heel tab might have made slipping into the shoe easier for some of us.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Heel tab
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps None

Removable insole

The shoe's insole is easy to remove as it's not glued, so there's no problem at all using third-party insoles or orthotics.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Removable insole
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps Yes

Misc

Reflective elements

We're thrilled to share that, unlike most running shoes released this year, the ASICS Asics Contend 5 Ps boasts standout reflective elements on the heel.

Asics Asics Contend 5 Ps Reflective elements
Test results
Asics Contend 5 Ps Yes