Our verdict

The Adidas Adistar 2.0 is a neutral daily trainer on steroids. We could easily mistake it for a stability shoe if we wore it with our eyes closed. It's got a well-cushioned, wide, and supportive platform which, in our opinion, works best for those easy recovery days. If we look past its disturbingly heavy setup, we can claim the Adistar 2.0 as a solid daily running option.

adidas marrakech boots clearance sale Pros

  • yeezy giveaway 2018 winner
  • Supportive for a neutral shoe
  • Wide platform
  • Secure foothold
  • Well-padded interiors
  • Highly breathable
  • Great for casual wear
  • Value for money
  • True to size

adidas marrakech boots clearance sale Cons

  • nmd orchid tint in feet and inches in meters chart
  • Firm heel landings

Audience verdict

86
Good!

Who should buy

We recommend this workhorse from Adidas to runners in search of the following:

  • a max-cushioned shoe for long and easy miles
  • a neutral shoe with a touch of support (semi-stability shoe)
  • a design that's stylish and comfortable enough for casual wear
  • a daily trainer that doesn't break the bank (Adistar 2.0 costs £20 less than similar shoes)

adidas adistar 2 0 who should buy 19856538 720

Who should NOT buy

The Adidas Adistar 2.0 is VERY heavy (11.6 oz/328g), even for its max-cushioned kind! You can easily find shoes with the same heel stack that weigh nearly 100g less.

For example, Adidas Adizero SL (speed-oriented, 8.6 oz/244g) or PUMA Velocity Nitro 2 (9.1 oz/257g).

Also, if you're a heel striker, you may prefer a plusher foam under the heel. Try the Adidas Ultraboost Light instead.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Who should not buy

Breathability

We pumped smoke through the shoe's upper to assess how breathable the material is. And the Adistar 2.0 was a pleasant surprise. We rated the shoe 5 out of 5 for breathability as it is one of the most well-ventilated running shoes we've tested!

The Adidas Adistar 2.0 shines in breathability! Literally. You can see how transparent its upper is.

When we look at the shoe's large mesh pores through our microscope, it becomes clear why the Adistar 2.0 is so airy.

adidas adistar 2 0 microscope 1 19911837 720

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Microscope 2

Test results
Adistar 2.0 5
Average 3.8
Compared to 234 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Outsole hardness

The shoe's Continental rubber is also not among the hardest we've seen, it is just average.

Based on these two measurements, we than a regular 400-500 mile shelf life from the Adidas Adistar 2.0.

adidas adistar 2 0 outsole hardness room temperatue 19856507 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 80.9 HC
Average 80.5 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 285 running shoes
Number of shoes
52.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole thickness

Using our calliper, we measured the thickness of the outsole rubber. At 3.4 mm, we found it moderately thick, sitting just at the average.

adidas adistar 2 0 outsole thickness 19856506 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 3.4 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.6 mm

Weight

H-E-A-V-Y. Tipping the scales at 11.6 oz (328g) per shoe, the Adistar 2.0 is a real monster.

Even if we only consider daily trainers with a heel stack of 33-35 mm, the average weight would be 10.2 oz (290g).

adidas track pant worn with heels boots pants.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 11.57 oz (328g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 305 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.26 oz (149g)
Weight
12.56 oz (356g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

According to Adidas, the heel stack on the Adistar 2.0 is 33 mm. This is very close to what our calliper measurement shows - 33.8 mm.

You definitely want this amount of cushioning (30 mm+) for long weekend runs of 10K and more.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Heel

We know, in the photo the Adistar looks MUCH taller than that. But the trick is: we could actually feel our feet sitting inside the foam rather than on top of it.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Heel stack
Test results
Adistar 2.0 33.8 mm
Average 33.7 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Heel stack
45.7 mm

Forefoot stack

Measuring the forefoot, we found it a bit thinner than stated by the brand - 25.8 mm as opposed to the official 27 mm.

Sure, it doesn't make the shoe feel less cushioned but it does affect the heel-to-toe drop (discussed below).

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Forefoot stack
Test results
Adistar 2.0 25.8 mm
Average 25.0 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Forefoot stack
36.9 mm

Drop

Contrary to the brand's statement, the shoe's drop is not 6 mm. Based on our calliper measurements, the heel drop is exactly 8 mm.

However, we believe that only very experienced runners sensitive to the drop could actually notice this nuance.

A typical offset for a daily trainer is 8.5 mm, so 8 mm feels right at home for most runners

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Drop (heel-to-toe)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 8.0 mm
Average 8.7 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.8 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Insole thickness

The insole doesn't add much to the shoe's stack height - only 3.1 mm.

A little thinner than the average but it proved to be just enough to keep us comfortable.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Insole thickness in the heel
Test results
Adistar 2.0 3.1 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 300 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

yeezy sesame goat shoes for women 2017.

Just like foot locker adidas jumper pants for women jcpenney, the 2.0 employs the REPETITOR+ foam which has a firmer component in the heel and a softer one in the rest of the midsole.

The primary (white) foam is somewhat soft (not plushy soft). Pressing a durometer against it, we discovered that at 22.4 HA, it is about 10% softer than road running shoes on average.

adidas bounce 2007 free trial.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Midsole softness in the heel (room temperature)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 22.4 HA
Average 21.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 232 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.5 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

In the heel, the firmer (blue) foam cradles the soft (white) foam. Based on our durometer measurement of 31.6 HA, it is 41% firmer than the white foam.

From our experience running in the Adistar 2.0, landings feel SO stable. Almost as if we were running in a stability shoe!

But to our great disappointment, these same landings feel pretty hard, especially when heel striking. So, if you are after a plush ride, go for the New Balance FF More v4 or the Brooks Glycerin 20 (adidas nemeziz noir shoes clearance boots 2016 Glycerin 20 GTS adidas probout us10 2016 price in india pakistan).

adidas adistar 2 0 secondary foam softness room temperature 19856514 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 31.6 HA
Average 24.9 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Difference in midsole softness in cold

We also checked how the shoe's primary foam behaves in cold temperatures. Turns out that it does get firmer but not as much as many other foams do.

After 20 minutes in the freezer, the durometer shows 28.3 HA. This is a little softer than the average.

So if you happen to leave your pair of Adistars outside overnight, it won't turn into a brick for your morning run.

We found that the Adistar 2.0 got 26.3% firmer after 20 minutes in the freezer. This is about the same difference in firmness as we see in many other road running shoes.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Midsole softness in cold
Test results
Adistar 2.0 26.3%
Average 25.5%
Compared to 231 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in midsole softness in cold
100%

Stability

Lateral stability test

The Adidas Adistar 2.0 is a mighty stable shoe. As you can see from our ankle movement test, it is nearly impossible to roll the foot over this sturdy sole.

We are not even sure why the brand came up with the shoe's stability version called the Adidas Adistar CS (CS stands for Cushioned Support).

Torsional rigidity

nemezis tango adidas shoes.

You mostly find this kind of torsional stiffness in stability shoes with medial football and shanks.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 4
Average 3.2
Compared to 283 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter is a beast too. In our manual assessment, we rated its stiffness as 4 out of 5.

Such a rigid heel counter held our boys firmly in place and the extension of firm foam at the back definitely helped with support.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 267 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

jacheta dama adidas imprimeu women black shoes

The landing surface of the Adistar 2.0 is BIG! That is one major contributor to the shoe's stability.

We measured the widest part of its forefoot at 118.1 mm. At the time of testing, this was wider than 92% of our lab-tested running shoes.

What's more, even among stability shoes, only Hoka Gaviota 4 can beat this Adidas shoe in its width (115 mm in the forefoot and 103 mm in the heel).

adidas adistar 2 0 midsole width forefoot 19856518 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 118.1 mm
Average 113.7 mm
Compared to 305 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.5 mm
jacheta dama adidas imprimeu women black shoes
126.5 mm

Midsole width in the heel

The Adistar 2.0 keeps beating records in the heel width as well. At 96.1 mm in its widest part, the platform is significantly wider than average.

We can see a great benefit here for runners with moderate overpronation who don't want to get a stability shoe.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Midsole width (heel)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 96.1 mm
Average 90.5 mm
Compared to 305 running shoes
Number of shoes
74.9 mm
Midsole width in the heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

For such a mighty sole, we were surprised to see the Adistar 2.0 bend so easily compared to the average.

It only required a force of 23.4N to bend the shoe to a 90-degree angle. Less than it takes on average.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 23.4N
Average 29.2N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 287 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Stiffness
94.4N

Difference in stiffness in cold

adidas ebay page covers for girls free full length.

The force gauge measurement went from 23.4N to 35.6N after the shoe spent 20 minutes in the freezer.

Luckily, it didn't get as stiff as many other shoes do. It doesn't turn into a brick for sure!

Because the Adistar 2.0 got 52.1% stiffer in the freezer test, we than it to feel less flexible when running in chilly weather as well.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 52.1%
Average 35.9%
Compared to 287 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in stiffness in cold
148%

Size and fit

adidas marrakech boots clearance sale | Toebox width at the widest part

The Adistar 2.0 comes with a medium-width toebox. We believe that it will accommodate most foot shapes, except really wide feet.

Based on our measurement of the widest toebox part (98.3 mm), it is just average for a running shoe.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Toebox width (widest part)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 98.3 mm
Average 98.4 mm
Compared to 305 running shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Toebox width at the widest part
109.1 mm

amazon adidas edge lux gold card sale

However, it gets more interesting around the big toe. We found that the shoe is 79.9 mm wide in this part of the toebox, which is noticeably wider than the average.

As a result, the shoe's toebox is less pointy and feels very accommodating to our feet.

adidas adistar 2 0 toebox width big toe 19856522 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 79.9 mm
Average 78.2 mm
Compared to 179 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.4 mm
amazon adidas edge lux gold card sale
92.5 mm

adidas marrakech boots clearance sale | Midfoot feel

We found that the Adistar 2.0 feels somewhat tight in the midfoot.

It seems like the tightness comes from the shoe components that are meant to create a firm foothold: raised sidewalls, enhanced eyelets, and even large three stripes.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Midfoot feel
Test results
Adistar 2.0 Tight

Tongue: gusset type

hanorac adidas dama sneakers 2016 women basketball.

But maybe that's even for the better because the gussets could've made the fit even tighter in the midfoot.

adidas adistar 2 0 tongue gusset type 19862569 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 None

Comfort

Tongue padding

adidas continental 80 yellow cross back dress.

We measured it at 8.7 mm which is noticeably thicker than the average. You can also see nearly as much padding in the heel collar. The shoe is really abundant with padding.

Adidas Adistar 2.0 Tongue padding
Test results
Adistar 2.0 8.7 mm
Average 5.6 mm
Compared to 302 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Removable insole

And if you choose to add even more padding or arch support, the shoe's insole is easily removable.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 Yes