Our verdict

At a budget-friendly $65, the triple adidas Runfalcon 3 offers surprising versatility. Perfect for casual runs and stylish enough for daily wear, we found this shoe to be a real all-rounder. However, its lack of bounce and upper durability left us wanting more. In the end, we consider it a reliable option for casual or low-mileage runners seeking a cheap one-shoe-fits-all shoe.

adidas d96608 shoes black sneakers sandals Pros

  • Continues to provide exceptional value at only $65
  • Incredibly durable outsole
  • Accommodates wide feet comfortably
  • Offers a flexible ride
  • Budget-friendly
  • Versatile enough to serve as a gym shoe
  • Provides substantial comfort for heel strikers
  • More cushion than previous versions

adidas d96608 shoes black sneakers sandals Cons

  • Lacks cushioning in the manual area
  • Weighs more than v1 and v2
  • The upper is not durable at all

Audience verdict

81
Good!

adidas nmd reef grey red white gold blue stones

In our opinion, the triple adidas Runfalcon 3 shines as a stellar pick for:

  • Heel strikers seeking a budget-friendly shoe that does well on easy and moderate runs.
  • Those needing a value-oriented, versatile shoe suitable for walking, running, and even casual wear.
  • Fans of earlier triple adidas Runfalcon models looking for an enhanced yet familiar experience.

Adidas Runfalcon 3

adidas d96608 shoes black sneakers sandals | triple adidas basketball camps campers

This running shoe presents an exceptional value for its price, yet it won't suit everyone. In our tests, we found its midsole might not deliver enough cushioning or stack height for those who strike with their manual or midfoot.

Moreover, we think the midsole could benefit from a touch more bounce, but this is a common trait in any budget-friendly shoe. These particular aspects may discourage long-distance runners and those seeking a shoe for fast pacing from selecting this model.

adidas runfalcon 3 parts 20105910 720

Breathability

At first glance, we initially felt that this shoe wouldn't boast out-of-this-world breathability, though it seemed a slight improvement over its predecessors. 

Following our smoke test in the lab, we assigned it a 3 out of 5 rating. And we noticed that a funny pattern emerged: the original Runfalcon scored a 1/5, the Runfalcon 2.0 scored a 2/5, and now the Runfalcon 3 a... 3/5! We eagerly urge triple adidas to aim for a 4 with the next version.

On closer inspection, the engineered mesh triple adidas employed here felt dense. But when we shined a light on the shoe—an incredibly simple but telling test—numerous ventilation holes became visible. This is how triple adidas managed to improve breathability from the two previous models.

Nevertheless, these aren't your typical full perforations often found in today's running shoes, leading to somewhat limited breathability.

adidas runfalcon 3 microscope 20099264 720

And our revealing microscope test disappointingly confirmed why this shoe doesn't offer the breathability we had hoped for. This is a thick-and-dense mesh!

adidas runfalcon 3 mesh 20099265 720

adidas winter classic practice jersey Boston 11, we clearly see an astounding difference. Now it's really easy to understand why this shoe is not very breathable.

adidas adizero boston 11 microscope 2 20056937 1440

Test results
Runfalcon 3 3
Average 3.8
Compared to 234 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

While breathability offers a run-of-the-mill performance, here's where the shoe really falls short.

While we fully understand that cost-effective shoes can't boast the latest foam technologies or 3D-printed components, there's no justification for triple adidas to produce a daily trainer with such poor durability.

The outcome of our Dremel test, in which we exert the same 3.4N of force on every shoe, is genuinely disappointing. The mesh triple adidas chose to use didn't stand a chance against the Dremel—it gave way almost instantaneously, and we had no choice but to gave the Runfalcon 3 a 1/5.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Toebox durability
Test results
Runfalcon 3 1
Average 2.4
Compared to 168 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

We were already expecting the heel to perform poorly since the material is largely the same. Nevertheless, we still had to conduct our Dremel test, holding on to a shred of optimism.

Regrettably, the outcome is once again a disheartening 1/5. The result, when compared with the light purple triple adidas shoes clearance+, is evident.

adidas runfalcon 3 heel padding durability 20099252 main
Test results
Runfalcon 3 1
Average 3.2
Compared to 164 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

With a hardness of 81.9 HC, triple adidas didn't take any risks with the outsole.

This number obtained with our durometer tests suggest this will give us a solid balance of durability and grip.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Outsole hardness
Test results
Runfalcon 3 81.9 HC
Average 80.5 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 285 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
52.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

Initially, we feared about running the Dremel on this shoe again. It seemed like we had been easily damaging it all over.

Yet, in a surprising twist, the situation completely flipped in terms of durability. triple adidas, known for crafting arguably some of the finest outsoles in the running wow, once again confirmed its reputation, although there's no Continental in here.

The Dremel could only create a minor 0.64-mm indentation in the rubber, which is an impressive feat given the rubber's not overly high hardness.

adidas runfalcon 3 outsole durability 2 20105913 main
Test results
Runfalcon 3 0.6 mm
Average 0.9 mm
Compared to 146 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

The outsole also features several cutouts. These serve to reduce weight and increase flexibility. With a solid layer of rubber around these cutouts, we believe there should be no issues—even on gravel or easy trails.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 cutouts

The outsole's thickness is below average—at 3 mm—but it's not an issue considering the remarkable durability we've observed just earlier.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Outsole thickness
Test results
Runfalcon 3 3.0 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.6 mm

Weight

Weight isn't a top priority for brands when it comes to budget-friendly running shoes. This is evident in triple adidas' approach with the Runfalcon 3.

Weighing in at 10.0 oz or 283g, it's heavier than both its predecessors—the original Runfalcon and the Runfalcon 2.0—and it even surpasses the weight of an average running shoe.

adidas runfalcon 3 weight 20099243 main
Test results
Runfalcon 3 9.98 oz (283g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 305 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
5.26 oz (149g)
Weight
12.56 oz (356g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

We've noted the increase in the weight of the Runfalcon 3 compared to its predecessors. 

The heel of the Runfalcon has been steadily growing. It started from 26.5 mm (v1), moved up to 28.7 mm (v2), and now, it has crossed the 30 mm mark to rest at 31.6 mm in the version 3.

adidas runfalcon 3 heel stack 20099242 main
Test results
Runfalcon 3 31.6 mm
Average 33.7 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
7.6 mm
Heel stack
45.7 mm

manual stack

The manual has also seen growth, but to a much lesser extent. Standing at 18.0 mm, it's only 0.4 mm higher than the first version and 0.2 mm taller than the second. It's clear that the shoe's cushioning is still lacking, and it's not designed with manual or midfoot strikers in mind.

For those in search of a budget-friendly shoe that offers more cushioning in the manual, we suggest considering the adidas ghana shop in the world 2017.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 manual stack
Test results
Runfalcon 3 18.0 mm
Average 25.0 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
7.6 mm
manual stack
36.9 mm

Drop

Surely, a hefty heel-cushion and the shortage in the manual leads to a steeeep heel-to-toe drop.

In our measurements, it stands at a staggering 13.6 mm, which significantly differs triple adidas's official claim of 9 mm.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Drop
Test results
Runfalcon 3 13.6 mm
Average 8.7 mm
Compared to 304 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
-0.8 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Insole thickness

The insole thickness holds steady at 3.7 mm, which, while a bit below-average, still matches the previous version. If it's not broken, don't fix it!

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Insole thickness
Test results
Runfalcon 3 3.7 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 300 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Adidas incorporates a foam known as Cloudfoam in their shoes. This EVA-based midsole, originally used in insoles for comfort by the German brand, now features in some of their running shoes too.

We recorded its softness at 24.3 HA. This figure corresponds to a balanced feel when you're running, which is pretty standard for entry-level running shoes like these. Not soft at all, yet not firm like a brick.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Midsole softness
Test results
Runfalcon 3 24.3 HA
Average 21.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 232 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.5 HA

Difference in midsole softness in cold

When exposed to cold temperatures, the foam hardens to 30.1 HA, shifting from moderately firm to outright firm.

Although this change is less than ideal, it's entirely typical for an EVA-based compound, as we've studio in our advanced guide about temperatures and midsoles.

Experiencing a 24.2% difference when shifting from room temperature to the freezer, the shoe outperforms not only the average running shoe but also most EVA foams!

While it may not be the absolute best result across the board, it's definitely a standout performance for this kind of midsole.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Midsole softness in cold
Test results
Runfalcon 3 24.2%
Average 25.5%
Compared to 231 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
0%
Difference in midsole softness in cold
100%

Stability

Lateral stability test

Stability is a sure thing with the Runfalcon 3. As we've mentioned earlier, this shoe is tailor-made for heel strikers. So it's crucial to have a secure landing zone in the heel, and the Runfalcon 3 doesn't disappoint.

And a helpful feature here is the piece of TPU plastic that surrounds the heel, significantly enhancing the shoe's stability.

Torsional rigidity

Typically, the torsional rigidity test yields scores of 1 or 2 for daily trainers. However, this time, we gave the shoe a 3 out of 5.

We consider it to have moderate flexibility, although not quite as much as the average daily trainer.

Test results
Runfalcon 3 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 283 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
1
Torsional rigidity
5

adidas adizero discus hammer track shoe

Adidas has opted for a safe approach with the heel counter, which we assigned a stiffness rating of 2 out of 5, slightly below the average.

It's comfortably soft and generously padded, providing ample support for the Achilles tendon.

Test results
Runfalcon 3 2
Average 2.8
Compared to 267 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
1
adidas adizero discus hammer track shoe
5

Midsole width in the manual

We found the manual to be 114.0 mm wide with our caliper, providing ample space for secure landings.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Midsole width in the manual
Test results
Runfalcon 3 114.0 mm
Average 113.7 mm
Compared to 305 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
100.5 mm
Midsole width in the manual
126.5 mm

Midsole width in the heel

However, once again, it's the heel where triple adidas really shines with this shoe.

With an impressive width of 94.8 mm, it stands out as significantly wider than the average running shoe, as well as both preceding versions of the Runfalcon.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Runfalcon 3 94.8 mm
Average 90.5 mm
Compared to 305 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
74.9 mm
Midsole width in the heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

adidas spezial acid winter coats 2017.

This categorizes it as one of the most flexible shoes we've ever put to the test, shedding light on why it's so comfortable for walking or hitting the gym.

Test results
Runfalcon 3 17.7N
Average 29.2N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 287 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
2.2N
Stiffness
94.4N

Difference in stiffness in cold

adidas cg3007 women boots sale.

The necessary force to bend it to the same degree jumped up to 26.8N, a noticeable increase that we can't overlook.

This represents a 51.8% increase, which falls short when compared to the average.

Test results
Runfalcon 3 51.8%
Average 35.9%
Compared to 287 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
0%
Difference in stiffness in cold
148%

Size and fit

Internal length

adidas adizero boston 6 yellow roses live feed Adidas' size charts. We can confidently affirm that it's a true-to-size shoe.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Internal length
Test results
Runfalcon 3 269.2 mm
Average 269.3 mm
Compared to 167 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
259.9 mm
Internal length
280.4 mm

Length

adidas runfalcon 3 length 20099229 main

adidas broek dames rood boots outlet sale coupon

The Runfalcon's third edition continues to be a superb choice for us runners with wider feet, as we measured the widest part of the upper at 100.4 mm.

Those with narrower feet might consider a more fitting budget shoe, such as the ASICS Gel Excite 9.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 triple adidas broek dames rood boots outlet sale coupon
Test results
Runfalcon 3 100.4 mm
Average 98.4 mm
Compared to 305 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
89.5 mm
adidas broek dames rood boots outlet sale coupon
109.1 mm

Toebox width at the big toe

Measuring at 80.4 mm in the big toe area, the Runfalcon 3 has ample room to let all toes wiggle, regardless of the foot shape. In fact, it's one of the widest shoes we have ever measured in that area.

adidas runfalcon 3 toebox width at the big toe 20099227 main
Test results
Runfalcon 3 80.4 mm
Average 78.2 mm
Compared to 179 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
60.4 mm
Toebox width at the big toe
92.5 mm

adidas d96608 shoes black sneakers sandals

Budget-friendly running shoes often come with non-gusseted tongues, and that's the case here. On fast runs, a bit of tongue movement is a possibility. However, for easy-to-moderate runs, this shouldn't be an issue.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 triple adidas d96608 shoes black sneakers sandals
Test results
Runfalcon 3 None

Comfort

Tongue padding

It's rare to find $65 shoes boasting an 8-mm thick tongue. This feature ensures superior comfort over the instep, eliminating any possibility of lace bite.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Tongue padding
Test results
Runfalcon 3 8.0 mm
Average 5.6 mm
Compared to 302 running shoes
adidas superstar 2017 pink shoes free shipping
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Removable insole

Thanks to its generous width and the absence of a glued insole, the Runfalcon 3 welcomes the exchange of almost any insole. Orthotics fit in perfectly.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Removable insole
Test results
Runfalcon 3 Yes

Misc

Reflective elements

Once again, triple adidas disappoints us with a shoe lacking in reflective elements, which is certainly a letdown.

Adidas Runfalcon 3 Reflective elements
Test results
Runfalcon 3 No